
While Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around for decades, it's gaining notoriety for its negative implications in the writing industry. The use of human generated work to train AI without the knowledge or permission of an author is as problematic as copyright violation. There's also the issue of how to distinguish AI generated prose from prose written by humans. Thus far, it appears the former is woefully bereft of emotional connection and does not approximate the standards of decent prose.
However, not everyone in the writing industry bemoans AI. The technology has proved useful for brainstorming, plot and character development, and research. It may even serve as an antidote for writer's block. Nevertheless, I wonder whether AI generated writing will become refined enough to fool the average reader into believing the work was created by a human. Worse yet, will readers come to prefer prose constructed through artificial intelligence?
Whether or not AI is deployed, the final product should be our own creation. Of course, plagiarism is never acceptable. But we're still defining what constitutes undue use that disqualifies a work from being designated as human authored (a daunting task). Should we assume folks will adhere to a standard code of ethics in the interest of preservation of intellectual property rights? Given the breakneck speed of AI development, most members of the Authors Guild who've commented on the matter in our member forum agree that we need some method for reining in its potential for abuse.
You may have noticed the large "Human Authored" seal I recently placed on my biography page. The seal was developed by the Guild to allow members to register their individual works as human authored. I registered my company, The Ebony Quill, LLC, for this reason. Nevertheless, some Guild members think the new seal is useless and readily subject to counterfeit. But I see it as a start at combating a growing threat to copyright infringement that doesn't involve handing over thousands of dollars to a copyright attorney. Though I don't necessarily look for a mark of approval or commendation to help me decide whether to purchase something, I appreciate seeing one. So, I'm going with the seal for now.
Overall, I see AI as a plus if it's deployed in an ethical manner. Unfortunately, the concept of ethics seems more and more elusive these days. But that's another story to be continued…